№01
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13669v1

Agents-K1: Towards Agent-native Knowledge Orchestration

Zongsheng Cao, Bihao Zhan, Jinxin Shi et al.

Agents-K1 addresses the lack of scientific knowledge orchestration in LLM agents by converting raw documents into agent-native knowledge graphs. Its core method involves a multimodal parser to extract detailed entities, evidence, and relations from full papers, an information extraction backbone trained with GRPO, and …

9
№02
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13361v1

Can I Buy Your KV Cache?

Luoyuan Zhang

This paper proposes a method to significantly reduce computation costs for large language models by precomputing and sharing Key-Value (KV) caches. Instead of each agent recomputing the KV cache for identical documents, a publisher can generate it once, allowing other agents to purchase access and skip the expensive pr…

9
№03
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13662v1

EurekAgent: Agent Environment Engineering is All You Need For Autonomous Scientific Discovery

Amy Xin, Jiening Siow, Junjie Wang et al.

EurekAgent's core method is "environment engineering," which focuses on designing the resources, constraints, and interfaces of an agent's execution environment to guide its behavior towards productive scientific discovery. The paper's main contribution is demonstrating that this environment-centric approach, rather th…

9
№04
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13607v1

Reasoning as Pattern Matching: Shared Mechanisms in Human and LLM Everyday Reasoning

Zach Studdiford, Gary Lupyan

This paper proposes that both humans and LLMs perform everyday reasoning through pattern matching, rather than abstract world models. By observing similar error patterns in human participants and LLMs on common-sense reasoning tasks, the researchers identify specific attention mechanisms in LLMs that implement this pat…

9
№05
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13598v1

Reward Modeling for Multi-Agent Orchestration

King Yeung Tsang, Zihao Zhao, Vishal Venkataramani et al.

This paper introduces Orchestration Reward Modeling (OrchRM), a self-supervised method for training multi-agent system orchestrators. OrchRM uses intermediate execution artifacts to create win-lose pairs for training a reward model, eliminating the need for human annotations. This approach significantly improves traini…

9
№06
cs.CL arxiv:2606.13681v1

EvoArena: Tracking Memory Evolution for Robust LLM Agents in Dynamic Environments

Jundong Xu, Qingchuan Li, Jiaying Wu et al.

EvoArena is a new benchmark suite designed to evaluate LLM agents in dynamic environments that progressively change over time. The paper introduces EvoMem, a memory system that tracks these environmental changes as structured update histories, allowing agents to reason about and adapt to evolving conditions. This appro…

9
№07
cs.CL arxiv:2606.13663v1

HyperTool: Beyond Step-Wise Tool Calls for Tool-Augmented Agents

Yaxin Du, Yifan Zhou, Yujie Ge et al.

HyperTool addresses the inefficiency of step-wise tool calls in LLM agents by introducing a unified, MCP-style interface. This allows models to execute complex tool workflows within a single, code-block-based call, reducing context consumption and simplifying dataflow management. HyperTool significantly improves agent …

9
№08
cs.CL arxiv:2606.13643v1

Recursive Agent Harnesses

Elias Lumer, Sahil Sen, Kevin Paul et al.

This paper introduces the Recursive Agent Harness (RAH), a novel approach that extends recursive language models by using full agent harnesses, equipped with tools and execution capabilities, instead of just model calls. The core method involves a parent agent generating and running executable scripts that spawn parall…

9
№09
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13608v1

AgentBeats: Agentifying Agent Assessment for Openness, Standardization, and Reproducibility

Xiaoyuan Liu, Jianhong Tu, Yuqi Chen et al.

This paper introduces Agentified Agent Assessment (AAA), a novel method for evaluating AI agents by using judge agents and standardized interaction protocols (A2A and MCP). AAA's core contribution is a unified, agent-agnostic assessment framework that separates evaluation logic from agent implementation, promoting open…

8
№10
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13380v1

An LLM System for Autonomous Variational Quantum Circuit Design

Kenya Sakka, Wataru Mizukami, Kosuke Mitarai

This paper presents an LLM-based autonomous system for designing variational quantum circuits, addressing the reliance on human expertise. The core method involves an iterative, closed-loop workflow that leverages LLMs for knowledge acquisition, critique, code generation, and experimental feedback. The system's contrib…

8
№11
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13572v1

ArogyaSutra: A Multi-Agent Framework for Multimodal Medical Reasoning in Indic Languages

Tanmoy Kanti Halder, Akash Ghosh, Subhadip Baidya et al.

This paper introduces ArogyaSutra, a multi-agent framework designed for multimodal medical reasoning in Indic languages. It addresses the limitations of existing English-centric models by integrating tool grounding and dual-memory mechanisms for step-wise reasoning. The framework is trained on ArogyaBodha, a novel larg…

8
№12
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13392v1

MiniMax Sparse Attention

Xunhao Lai, Weiqi Xu, Yufeng Yang et al.

MiniMax Sparse Attention (MSA) addresses the quadratic cost of attention in ultra-long contexts by introducing a blockwise sparse mechanism built on Grouped Query Attention (GQA). It uses a lightweight "Index Branch" to select relevant key-value blocks for each GQA group, and then a "Main Branch" performs exact attenti…

8
№13
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13449v1

Toward Instructions-as-Code: Understanding the Impact of Instruction Files on Agentic Pull Requests

Ali Arabat, Mohammed Sayagh

This paper investigates how instruction files impact AI-agent performance in generating pull requests (Agentic-PRs). By analyzing a large dataset of Agentic-PRs, the study compares project performance before and after the introduction of these instructions. The core finding is that simply providing instruction files do…

8
№14
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13468v1

Understanding the Rejection of Fixes Generated by Agentic Pull Requests -- Insights from the AIDev Dataset

Mahmoud Abujadallah, Ali Arabat, Mohammed Sayagh

This paper investigates why AI-generated code fixes are rejected in software projects, finding that nearly half are discarded. Through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of rejected pull requests, the authors identify 14 specific reasons for rejection, categorized into four main themes. This understanding aims to …

8
№15
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13441v1

Why Sampling Is Not Choosing: Intentionality, Agency, and Moral Responsibility in Large Language Models

Joseph Keshet

This paper argues that Large Language Models (LLMs) lack genuine agency and moral responsibility because their operations are based on probabilistic mappings, not intrinsic intentionality or self-attributed action. The authors contend that LLMs' apparent intentionality is derived, their outputs are not commitments, and…

8
№16
cs.LG arxiv:2606.13565v1

A2D2: Fine-Tuning Any-Length Discrete Diffusion for Adaptive Decoding

Sophia Tang, Yuchen Zhu, Molei Tao et al.

This paper introduces A2D2, a framework for fine-tuning discrete diffusion models to generate sequences of any length guided by rewards. Its core method involves jointly optimizing insertion and unmasking policies with a quality-based inference schedule, theoretically ensuring convergence to the desired reward-tilted d…

8
№17
cs.LG arxiv:2606.13461v1

Reinforcement Learning for Neural Model Editing

Shaivi Malik

This paper frames neural model editing as a reinforcement learning problem, where agents learn to modify model weights through reward signals. The core contribution is a flexible RL framework with custom environments and a reward function that balances utility preservation with task-specific editing. This approach succ…

8
№18
cs.CL arxiv:2606.13349v1

From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent

Haishuo Fang, Yue Feng, Iryna Gurevych

This paper introduces ProReviewer, a proactive scientific peer review agent that addresses the limitations of passive LLM-based review. Its core method formulates the review process as a Markov Decision Process, enabling the agent to actively investigate suspicious paper sections based on accumulated evidence, guided b…

8
№19
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13566v1

A Three-Layer Framework for AI in Scientific Discovery

Guojun Liao

This paper proposes a three-layer framework for AI in scientific discovery, moving beyond just search and execution. Its core contribution is Layer 2, which focuses on AI's capacity for qualitative model formation through structural insight, enabling the recognition and resolution of inadequate scientific frameworks. T…

7
№20
cs.AI arxiv:2606.13544v1

Adaptive Turn-Taking for Real-time Multi-Party Voice Agents

Soumyajit Mitra, Prabhat Pandey, Abhinav Jain et al.

This paper introduces ModeratorLM, a novel approach for real-time multi-party voice agents that improves turn-taking by assigning explicit roles to agents. By conditioning turn-taking on these roles and employing a streaming speech LLM, the system significantly enhances precision and recall while reducing interruptions…

7